National Office of Animal Health

...for the welfare of all animals

HOME | NEWS | MEDICINES TOPICS | ABOUT NOAH | BOOKS | CODE | LINKS | CONTACT | JOBS | COMPENDIUM

Topics and Briefing Documents

HEALTH AND WELFARE

CONTROLS ON ANIMAL MEDICINES

ANTIBIOTICS

ANIMALS IN RESEARCH

ORGANOPHOSPHATES

SAFETY OF FOOD & RESIDUES

VACCINES

ADVERTISING

ADVERSE REACTIONS

ENVIRONMENT


CONSUMER ATTITUDES

 

Organophosphate Group Litigation - An Update

November 2002

In the Court of Appeal on 21 November 2002, Lord Justice Simon Brown, Lord Justice Buxton and Lord Justice Carnwath finally struck out the Organophosphate Group Litigation, the "rump" of a legally-aided multi-party action concerning sheep dip products with just seven remaining claimants.

The Defendant manufacturers had applied for the cases to be struck under Part 24 of the CPR, but also on the grounds that the continuance of the action amounted to an abuse of process as the Claimants had failed to meet requirements to support their pleadings with medical evidence satisfactorily attributing the alleged injuries (a variety of what was said to be neurological and psychological conditions) through exposure to organophosphate chemicals.

The judgement was also extended to bar the progress of new cases without the benefit of radically new and compelling evidence.

January 2002

By Order of the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, on 29 January 2002, the claims of the claimants in the Group Action in relation to organophosphate sheep dips were dismissed "on the grounds that the continuation of those claims is an abuse of the Court".

The cases of Bruce, Sayce, Stoker and Tyrer were "dismissed on the additional grounds that there was no reasonable prospect of success".

Each party will pay their own costs.

Permission to appeal was refused.

November 2001

In a draft Judgement on 9 November 2001, the Honorable Mr Justice Morland stated in relation to the Organophosphate Group Litigation:

"Further detailed reading and rereading of upwards of thirty ring-binders and transcripts of oral submissions have fortified my general conclusion that on the evidence as it now stands the claimants' claims are unviable, the group action would fail and that it would be unjust and oppressive to the defendants to allow it to continue in the hope that at some indefinite date in the future the claimants would be able to put their house in order and adduce sufficiently adequate evidence on the all-important issue of causation from experts with the relevant expertise."

December 2000

Generic Claimant’s solicitors recommended to claimants that the organophosphate sheep dip litigation did not have reasonable prospects of success.

 

NOAH Ltd
9 December 2002