National Office of Animal Health
...for the welfare of all animals

Bookmark and Share
 

HOME | NEWS | MEDICINES TOPICS | ABOUT NOAH | BOOKS | CODE | NCAH | LINKS | CONTACT | JOBS | COMPENDIUM | RESPONSIBLE

Representing the Manufacturers of Animal Medicines
noahlogo.gif (702 bytes)
National Office of Animal Health Limited
A Member of FEDESA, the European Federation of Animal Health and COMISA, representative body of the Worldwide Animal Health Industry

European Elections, June 1999

A message to UK candidates

NOAH mission and the role of the animal health industry

The National Office of Animal Health represents the UK animal medicine industry whose aim is to provide safe, effective, quality medicines for the treatment and welfare of all animals.

The association currently has 34 corporate members and 10 associate members. In 1998 NOAH's members accounted for nearly 95% of the £384 million UK animal health market. NOAH is a founder member of FEDESA (the European Federation for Animal Health).

Animals Need Medicines Too

Animal medicines are fundamental for the well-being of European animals, and part of the solution to provide safe and affordable European food.

Also, as more pet owners seek specialist care for their animals and advances in both medical and surgical technology continue, the prospects for a healthy, happy companion animal population have never been better. More animals than ever can look forward to a long and healthy life and pet owners to a longer and more fulfilling relationship with their pet.

That is good news for us as well as our animals. A healthy animal population helps to prevent the spread of zoonotic diseases, which can affect both animals and humans. Salmonella and rabies are well known examples.

Medicine availability: threatened by EU regulation

EU law rightly requires that each animal medicine is licensed before it can be sold. In order to develop and maintain animal medicines on the market, companies need a science based, predictable approval process for products. NOAH recognises the need for a stringent licensing system to ensure safety for animals, people who use the medicines, the environment and the consumers of livestock produce. Yet over-regulation is stifling the industry; escalating costs and requirements are forcing long-standing products off the market: unpredictability is preventing investment in the medicines of the future, particularly for the farming sector.

In a survey conducted by FEDESA, 67% of senior regulators believed the existing system has damaged product availability for minor species or the treatment of uncommon diseases. 94% want reform of the rules for old products and active substances.

FEDESA has also reported that, thanks to the additional burden of regulation on medicines for food animals, 70% of international research funding is now being directed at pet products.

NOAH looks forward to working with the UK Members of the European Parliament, to reform the regulatory framework so that all animals can have access to the best prevention and treatment of disease.

Distribution of Animal Medicines

In the next 5 years there are likely to be proposals from the Commission to harmonise the system of animal medicine distribution. Britain's highly regarded distribution system is at risk from other countries which insist that medicines should be sold only on prescription.

The British system requires potent medicines, demanding professional diagnosis, to be sold only on prescription, but allows specified medicines to be sold by Government registered animal health distributors. This practice, which is widely supported, permits the users of medicines practical access to the products they need to protect their animals, and encourages competition.

Monopolies are anti-competitive. Restrictive distribution systems often lead to black markets.

We seek support of MEPs to allow the proven British distribution system for animal medicines to remain in place.

Antibiotics for animals

Antibiotic use in animals is not seen by experts as a major contributor to human antibiotic resistance problems. The World Health Organisation's Berlin Conference in November 1997 reported that the tragic growth of antibiotic resistance in human medicine was 'primarily' due to over-use and misuse in human medicine around the world - a view echoed by the House of Lords select Committee on Science and Technology in 1998.

In addition, a group of leading scientists, including Nobel prizewinners, working under the auspices of the Heidelberg Appeal Nederland Foundation, has published a further independent assessment of the issue which finds no link between animal use and human resistance.

Nevertheless the international animal health industry and its veterinary and farming colleagues, recognise the concerns over antibiotic resistance in humans and acknowledge their responsibility in this area. A wide scale monitoring programme and review is currently being conducted through the European Commission of all antibiotic digestive enhancers, although its future is threatened by the EU ban on four active ingredients.

Moreover, our industry has long recognised that it has a role to play in reducing the need for antibiotics usage. In 1996 FEDESA published its Code of Practice on the Responsible Use of Antibiotics. In autumn 1997 the Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture Alliance (RUMA), was established to promote the highest standards of food safety, animal health and animal welfare in British livestock farming. Representatives of RUMA have met with the Commission: the initiative is being seen as a model that could be used in other EU member states.

These moves have taken on a global importance with the publication this year of 'Joint Guidelines on the Prudent Use of Antibiotics in Animals', where the world organisations for farmers, veterinarians and the animal health industry committed to new global principles. These principles will be carried through to daily practice.

Some have suggested that "antibiotics are too important to give to animals" but our farm and companion animals deserve protection and treatment - and healthy food comes from healthy animals.

We urge all MEPs to ensure that proper consideration is given to the wide ranging consequences to animal and human health of any further restrictions on antibiotics and other animal medicines.

National Office of Animal Health Ltd, 3 Crossfield Chambers, Gladbeck Way, Enfield, Middlesex, England, EN2 7HF
Telephone:+44 (0)20 8367 3131 Facsimile:+44 (0)20 8363 1155
E-mail: noah@noah.co.uk
Website: www.noah.co.uk

 

HOME | NEWS | MEDICINES TOPICS | ABOUT NOAH | BOOKS | CODE | NCAH | LINKS | CONTACT | JOBS | COMPENDIUM | RESPONSIBLE


Bookmark and Share